Bid Results

ROCKINGHAM IM 091-1(66) DESIGN-BUILD
BID OPENING: MAY 18, 2016
DESIGN-BUILD TEAMTECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(50 POINT SCALE) *
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($)COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(50 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

Barletta Heavy Division, Inc. / Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
38.8063
$55,775,000.00
39.7131
78.5194
3

Reed & Reed, Inc. / HDR Engineering, Inc.
38.5925
$44,300,000.00
50.0000
88.5925
1

Kubricky Construction Corp. / Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc.

32.2050

$45,645,645.45

48.5260

80.7130

2


Lunda Construction Company / Figg Bridge Engineers, Inc.
31.7138
$55,653,000.00
39.8002
71.5139
4
Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal:
$44,300,000.00
Apparent Best Value Score: 88.5925

*For numerical ratings of Technical Proposals, see Memorandum RE: Technical Evaluation Committee Results

SOUTH BURLINGTON IM CULV(24)/GEORGIA IM CULV (25)
DESIGN-BUILD
BID OPENING: OCTOBER 14, 2015
DESIGN-BUILD TEAMTECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(45 POINT SCALE) *
TRAFFIC IMPACT PROPOSAL (10 POINT SCORE)AS READ COST PROPOSAL($)COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(45 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK
Kubricky Construction Corp./Clough Harbour & Associates LLP.
33.6161

4.3364

South Burlington
$12,620,000.00
28.9764
66.9289
2

Georgia

$11,120,000.00

Total

$23,740,000.00

J.A. McDonald Inc./Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
35.7186

7.0000

South Burlington
$7,203,660.00
45.0000
87.7186
1

Georgia

$8,083,000.00

Total

$15,286,660.00

Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal:
$15,286,660.00
Apparent Best Value Score: 87.7186

*For numerical ratings of Technical Proposals, see Memorandum RE: Technical Evaluation Committee Results

RYEGATE STP CULV(10) DESIGN-BUILD
BID OPENING: MARCH 5, 2014
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE) *
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

Engineers Construction,Inc./DuBois & King, Inc.
32.4147
$15,248,000.00
60.0000
92.4147
1

Winterset, Inc./Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.
34.4350
$16,593,700.00
55.1342
89.5692
3

Kubricky Construction Corporation/Aecom Technical Services, Inc.
33.5117
$15,966,966.96
57.2983
90.8100
2
Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal:
$15,248,000.00
Apparent Best Value Score: 92.4147

*For numerical ratings of Technical Proposals, see Memorandum RE: Technical Evaluation Committee Results

BRATTLEBORO IM 091-(65) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: MARCH 14, 2013
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(50 POINT SCALE) *
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(50 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

PCL Civil Constructors, Inc./Figg Bridge Engineers, Inc.
35.67
$59,490,000.00
45.39
81.05
1

Reed & Reed, Inc./HDR Engineering, Inc.
30.94
$54,000,000.00
50.00
80.94
2

Lane Construction Corporation/Hardesty & Hanover, LLP
31.00
$82,812,233.00
32.60
63.60
3
Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $54,000,000.00
Apparent Best Value Score: 81.05

*For numerical ratings of Technical Proposals, see Memorandum RE: Technical Evaluation Committee Results

MILTON IM 089-3 (66) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 5, 2012
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE) *
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

Harrison and Burrowes Bridge Constructors, Inc. /Clough Harbour & Associates, LLP
33.08
$28,277,700.00
49.01
82.09
3

Reed & Reed, Inc./Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.
32.44
$29,788,000.00
46.52
78.96
4

Tetra Tech Construction, Inc./URS Corporation
31.19
$23,098,000.00
60.00
91.19
1

Beck & Belluci, Inc./Hoyle Tanner and Associates, Inc.
30.33
$24,639,821.08
56.25
86.58
2

Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $23,098,000.00
Apparent Best Value Score: 91.19

*For numerical ratings of Technical Proposals, see Memorandum RE: Technical Evaluation Committee Results

WINDSOR IM 091-1 (64) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: JULY 25, 2012
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE) *
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

Beck & Bellucci, Inc/Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc.
27.80
$19,958,016.49
60.00
87.80
3

Kubricky Construction Corp./AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
31.30
$23,500,000.00
50.96
82.26
4

Tetra Tech Construction, Inc./Ryan-Biggs Associates, P.C.
22.79
Non-Responsive

The Lane Construction Corp./Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
31.83
$20,624,561.00
58.06
89.89
1

Winterset, Inc./Parsons Brinkerhoff, Inc.
31.09
$20,381,800.00
58.75
89.84
2

Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $19,958,016.49
Apparent Best Value Score: 89.89

* For numerical ratings of Technical Proposals, see Memorandum RE: Technical Evaluation Committee Results

* Denotes change in Amount from Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal to Confirmed lowest Cost Proposal

RICHMOND STP RS 0274 (11) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 16, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE)
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
32.72
$12,900,000.00
60.00
92.72
1

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
Non-Responsive

Kubricky Construction Corporation/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.
31.44
$18,770,676.00
41.23
72.67
2

Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $12,900,000.00
Apparent Best Value Score: 92.72

AND

RICHMOND STP RS 0274 (11) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 16, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE)
CONFIRMED COST PROPOSAL($)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
32.72
$12,900,000.00
60.00
92.72
1

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
Non-Responsive

Kubricky Construction Corporation/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.
31.44
* $18,777,676.00
* 41.22
* 72.66
2

Confirmed Lowest Cost Proposal: $12, 900,000.00
Confirmed Best Value Score: 92.72

AND

RICHMOND STP RS 0274 (11) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: DECEMBER 16, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(40 POINT SCALE)
CONFIRMED COST PROPOSAL($)
(REVISED)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(60 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
32.72
*$13,900,000.00
60.00
92.72
1

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
Non-Responsive

Kubricky Construction Corporation/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.
31.44
$18,777,676.00
41.22
72.66
2

Confirmed Lowest Cost Proposal: *$13,900,000.00
Confirmed Best Value Score: 92.72

* Revised under Bid Protest January 3, 2011

BRATTLEBORO IM 091-1 (50) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: OCTOBER 5, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(30 POINT SCALE)
AS READ COST PROPOSAL($)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(70 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

Beck & Bellucci, Inc./
TY Lin International
24.90
$12,476,857.83
70.00
94.90
1

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
26.34
$23,394,000.00
37.33
63.67
4

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
24.48
$18,888,700.00
46.24
70.72
3

Winterset, Inc./
Parsons-Brinkerhoff
21.24
$16,860,278.40
51.80
73.04
2

Apparent Lowest Cost Proposal: $12, 476, 857.83
Apparent Best Value Score: 94.90

AND

BRATTLEBORO IM 091-1 (50) DESIGN-BUILD
BIDS OPENED: OCTOBER 5, 2010
DESIGN-BUILD TEAM
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORE
(30 POINT SCALE)
CONFIRMED COST PROPOSAL($)
COST PROPOSAL SCORE
(70 POINT SCALE)
TOTAL
SCORE
(100 POINT SCALE)
RANK

Beck & Bellucci, Inc./
TY Lin International
24.90
$12,476,857.83
70.00
94.90
1

Harrison & Burrowes, Inc./
CHA
26.34
$23,394,000.00
37.33
63.67
4

J.A. McDonald, Inc./
URS Corporation
24.48
$18,888,700.00
46.24
70.72
3

Winterset, Inc./
Parsons-Brinkerhoff
21.24
$16,860,278.40
51.80
73.04
2

Confirmed Lowest Cost Proposal: $12, 476, 857.83
Confirmed Best Value Score: 94.90